






Who on this team appears naturally suited for leadership?
Who might thrive in operations?
Who can be given an outcome and figure out how to get there?
Who needs more structure?
Who might be sitting in a role that fights against how they're naturally wired?
Who could be incredible if we moved them into a different role?
Where could two people naturally experience friction?
Where might we need stronger management, accountability, or systems?





Why do I have to explain this five times?
Why can't she just make the decision?
Why does he need me to approve everything?
Why does she keep missing these tiny details?
Why does this manager avoid hard conversations?
Why are these two constantly butting heads?
Why does this person need so much reassurance?
Why can't I delegate this without it coming right back to me?
Why is everyone exhausted?
Why did one of my BEST employees just quit?











This is the piece I care about most.
I don’t want to build businesses that own me. I want the option to be there because I WANT to be there, not because everything falls apart if I disappear. I’ve been able to take essentially an entire summer off and act like I’m retired.
I’m not checking into my businesses every eight minutes. I’m not sitting inside every meeting. I’m not the person everyone has to ask before a decision gets made. I’m not required for the companies to continue operating.
And that didn’t happen because I magically became better at delegation.
It happened because I built teams capable of leading without me.
This tool has been one of the things I’ve used to help me do that.
If true freedom is what you want from entrepreneurship, your business eventually has to be able to function without your brain sitting inside every decision.
That requires the right people.
You can only scale as far as the people carrying the business with you can hold.
At some point, your personal hustle stops being the answer. You cannot work enough hours to compensate for the wrong leadership team. You cannot personally approve every decision and call that scale. You cannot be the operations department, culture keeper, closer, trainer, problem solver, and CEO forever and expect your business to grow exponentially.
Real scale requires people who can hold bigger roles. The right operator. The right leader. The right salesperson. The right detail person. The right creative. The right second-in-command. The person who can take an entire outcome off your plate instead of simply taking tasks from you.
Understanding how your people naturally operate can help you decide who may be capable of growing with the company and where you may need different talent as the company changes.
This one might hurt a little.
Business owners get emotionally attached to people. Especially small business owners. You know their spouse. You’ve watched their kids grow up.
They’ve been with you forever. They helped you during a hard season. You feel loyal to them.
Maybe you’re a recovering people pleaser like a lot of us are.
And suddenly you’re making decisions about the future of a multimillion-dollar business based on feelings. On the opposite end, sometimes someone has been with you so long that they’ve learned exactly how far they can push you. They know you’ll cave. They know you’ll take the work back. They know you’ll avoid the hard conversation. And before you realize it, your employee is essentially managing you.
That’s not leadership. And it’s definitely not freedom.
The Leadership Operating Profile gives you behavioral data to put beside the emotions. Not instead of your judgment. Not instead of performance. Not instead of conversations. But beside them.
So instead of: “But she’s been with me seven years…”
You can ask: Is this actually the person who can hold the role my company needs three years from
now?
That’s a CEO question.
Hire. Train. Get excited. Something doesn’t work. Try harder.
Have the same conversation five times. Get frustrated. They quit. Or you finally let them go. Post the job again. Interview another 30 people. Start training all over again. Repeat.
That revolving door is expensive. It’s exhausting for you. It’s exhausting for your team.
And, if we’re being completely transparent, after enough turnover it can start to look like the problem is leadership.
People start wondering: Why does nobody stay there?
Sometimes the answer IS leadership. We should always be willing to look at ourselves. But sometimes the bigger issue is that we keep hiring people whose natural wiring doesn’t fit the roles we’re putting them into and then acting shocked when it doesn’t work. I’d rather know more before I start the relationship.
It helps me decide who I actually want to spend my time interviewing and gives me additional context for the conversations I choose to have.
One wrong person can cost you someone you NEVER wanted to lose.
That’s what scares me more than the cost of replacing the wrong hire.
You can replace the wrong hire.
But what if your highest performer finally gets sick of carrying their weight?
What if your best leader gets exhausted from managing unnecessary drama?
What if your most loyal employee stops loving their job because one person changed the entire
culture?
What if three good employees leave before you finally realize who the common denominator
was?
The cost of the wrong person isn’t always the person themselves. Sometimes it’s everyone around them.
A polished 45-minute conversation is not the same thing as working beside someone for 45
hours a week. Great answer. Great outfit. Great energy. Great resume. Great references.
You leave thinking: OMG. I found my person.
Three months later: Who the hell did I interview?
Interview catfishing is real.
This gives you another layer of information before you commit your time to the interview, much less your payroll to the person In fact, you may discover that profiling the people you already have is even more valuable than profiling your next hire.
You may have an incredible person whose abilities simply aren’t being utilized in the role they’re currently in.
Sometimes the solution isn’t another job posting.
Your next leader might already work for you.
Your future operations person may be sitting in a completely different role.
Someone you thought wasn’t ambitious enough may simply be bored.
Someone you’ve loaded with responsibility may be operating in a role that constantly pushes
against their natural tendencies.
Someone may need significantly more responsibility.
Someone else may need a narrower lane.
You may have incredible talent you’re simply not optimizing.
This isn’t a mental-health or burnout diagnostic tool. But when I look at someone’s natural operating profile alongside what you’re currently asking
them to carry, I can often identify places where I would start asking better questions.
Is this person carrying a role that constantly fights how they naturally operate?
Are they likely being overmanaged?
Are they underutilized?
Do they need more responsibility?
Are we expecting an unsustainable pace from them?
Is a highly capable person bored out of their mind?
Is someone constantly compensating for a mismatch somewhere else on the team?
Those are conversations I want happening before the resignation letter shows up.
Some people need freedom. Some need structure. Some want every detail. Some want the destination and room to figure out the route. Some people want to brainstorm with you.
Others would rather you tell them the desired outcome and get out of their way.
Leading everyone exactly the same isn’t fair leadership.
Understanding the person allows you to adapt the way you lead them.
A yellow flag does not always mean: Don’t hire this person.
Sometimes it means:
Hire them AND put a system around this.
Hire them AND make sure their manager understands this.
Hire them BUT don’t put them in charge of that.
Hire them AND build checks and balances around an area where errors could become
expensive.
That’s a completely different way to build a team.

Includes:
One Leadership Operating Profile
Personalized written report
Leadership strengths
Communication preferences
Decision-making tendencies
Leadership blind spots
Includes:
Two Leadership Operating Profiles
Side-by-side comparison
Communication observations
Potential friction points
Role-alignment observations
Questions I would investigate further
Personalized comparison Loom from Dr. Elise
Includes:
Unlimited Leadership Operating Profiles
Reports for new hires and current team members
Quarterly leadership reviews
Ongoing profile comparisons
Secure access to your reports
Save $1000 when you locked in for 1 year. Pay $1,999 for the full year instead of $3,000.
Includes:
Up to five Leadership Operating Profiles
Full team comparison
Leadership observations
Communication and friction analysis
Role-alignment observations
Delegation recommendations
Accountability recommendations
Potential underutilization observations
Leadership and operations potential
Current team gaps
Next-hire recommendations
Strategic action plan
Personalized Loom analysis directly from Dr. Elise
One Leadership Operating Profile
Personalized written report
Leadership strengths
Communication preferences
Decision-making tendencies
Leadership blind spots
Unlimited Leadership Operating Profiles
Reports for new hires and current team member
Quarterly leadership reviews
Ongoing profile comparisons
Secure access to your reports
Up to five Leadership Operating Profiles
Ideally you + four key team members
Full team comparison
Leadership observations
Communication and friction analysis
Role-alignment observations
Delegation observations
Accountability observations
Identification of potentially underutilized talent
Areas where someone may need more or less responsibility
Potential leadership and operations candidates
Gaps I see in the current team
Recommendations for the type of person you may need to hire next
Customized strategic action plan
Personalized Loom analysis directly from Dr. Elise
Included when you choose the Go All In Membership by Monday, August 3, 2026.
Up to five Leadership Operating Profiles
Full team comparison
Leadership observations
Communication and friction analysis
Role-alignment observations
Delegation recommendations
Accountability recommendations
Potential underutilization observations
Leadership and operations potential
Current team gaps
Next-hire recommendations
Strategic action plan
Personalized Loom analysis directly from Dr. Elise
Two Leadership Operating Profiles
Side-by-side comparison
Communication observations
Potential friction points
Role-alignment observations
Questions I would investigate further
Personalized comparison Loom from Dr. Elise
Final two candidates for an important hire
Two potential leadership candidates
Two business partners
Leader + employee
Two employees experiencing recurring friction
Two people you’re considering for a larger role

My teams run the businesses.
My leaders get to lead.
The companies continue to grow.
Our team members continue to have careers, income, opportunity, and leadership paths inside those companies.
I can step in because I want to.
I can teach.
I can create.
I can strategize.
I can look at the numbers.
I can support my leaders.
And then I can go live my life.



Not even close.
Hiring is one of my favorite ways to use it because I want the information before I interview someone.
But I also use profiles for existing employees, leadership development, role alignment, delegation, team restructuring, consulting, communication, and understanding how different people work together.
And clearly I take it even further because I’ve used it with people who work inside my home too.
If I’m depending on someone, I’m interested in understanding how they’re wired
No.
And that’s not the point.
Someone can be phenomenal in one role and miserable in another.
We’re looking for understanding, alignment, potential friction, and information you can use to make a better decision.
No.
Nothing can guarantee that, and I’d be suspicious of anything that claimed it could.
Think of this as another layer of information alongside interviews, references, work samples, experience, performance, and your own judgment.
Absolutely not.
I use it BEFORE the interview.
It helps me decide who I actually want to spend my time interviewing and gives me additional context for the conversations I choose to have.
Yes.
I personally use the assessment with candidates and contractors from other countries as part of my hiring process..
YES.
In fact, you may discover that profiling the people you already have is even more valuable than profiling your next hire.
You may have an incredible person whose abilities simply aren’t being utilized in the role they’re currently in.
It cannot diagnose burnout, predict a resignation, or diagnose any mental-health condition.
What it can do is help us identify where someone’s natural operating tendencies may be misaligned with what their current role is asking them to do.
When I combine that with what you tell me about their responsibilities, performance, workload, management structure, and what’s currently happening inside the company, I can point out areas where I would start asking harder questions.
Is someone underutilized?
Overmanaged?
Carrying responsibilities that constantly fight how they naturally operate?
Bored?
Missing the autonomy they need?
Being asked to maintain a pace that doesn’t fit them?
Those are things I’d rather investigate before a great employee hands you a resignation letter.
Approximately 15–20 minutes.
Yes.
Assessment information is used to deliver the Leadership Operating Profile and the services included in the package selected.

